Esther R. C. Janssen, Ilona M. Punt, Sander M. J. van Kuijk, Eric A. Hoebink, Nico L. U. van Meeteren, Paul C. Willems
August 2020, Volume 29, Issue 8, pp 1909 - 1916 Original Article Read Full Article 10.1007/s00586-020-06473-w
First Online: 29 May 2020
On average, 56% of patients report a clinically relevant reduction in pain after lumbar spinal fusion (LSF). Preoperatively identifying which patient will benefit from LSF is paramount to improve clinical decision making, expectation management and treatment selection. Therefore, this multicentre study aimed to develop and validate a clinical prediction tool for a clinically relevant reduction in pain 1 to 2 years after elective LSF.
The outcomes were defined as a clinically relevant reduction in predominant (worst reported pain in back or legs) pain 1 to 2 years after LSF. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient characteristics from 202 patients were used to develop a prediction model by logistic regression. Data from 251 patients were used to validate the model.
Nonsmokers (odds ratio = 0.41 [95% confidence interval = 0.19–0.87]), with lower Body Mass Index (0.93 [0.85–1.01]), shorter pain duration (0.49 [0.20–1.19]), lower American Society of Anaesthesiologists score (4.82 [1.35–17.25]), higher Visual Analogue Scale score for predominant pain (1.05 [1.02–1.08]), lower Oswestry Disability Index (0.96 [0.93–1.00]) and higher RAND-36 mental component score (1.03 [0.10–1.06]) preoperatively had a higher chance of a clinically relevant reduction in predominant pain. The area under the curve of the externally validated model yielded 0.68. A nomogram was developed to aid clinical decision making.
Using the developed nomogram surgeons can estimate the probability of achieving a clinically relevant pain reduction 1 to 2 years after LSF and consequently inform patients on expected outcomes when considering treatment.
Read Full Article